Aggregating and Grouping Data

Last updated on 2023-04-21 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 60 minutes

Overview

Questions

How can I summarize my data by aggregating, filtering, or ordering query results?
How can I make sure column names from my queries make sense and aren’t too long?

Objectives

Apply aggregation functions to group records together.
Filter and order results of a query based on aggregate functions.
Employ aliases to assign new names to items in a query.
Save a query to make a new table.
Apply filters to find missing values in SQL.

COUNT and GROUP BY

Aggregation allows us to combine results by grouping records based on value. It is also useful for calculating combined values in groups.

Let’s go to the surveys table and find out how many individuals there are. Using the wildcard * counts the number of records (rows):

SQL

SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM surveys;

We can also find out how much all of those individuals weigh:

SQL

SELECT COUNT(*), SUM(weight)
FROM surveys;

We can output this value in kilograms (dividing the value by 1000.00), then rounding to 3 decimal places: (Notice the divisor has numbers after the decimal point, which forces the answer to have a decimal fraction)

SQL

SELECT ROUND(SUM(weight)/1000.00, 3)
FROM surveys;

There are many other aggregate functions included in SQL, for example: MAX, MIN, and AVG.

Challenge

Write a query that returns: the total weight, average weight, minimum and maximum weights for all animals caught over the duration of the survey. Can you modify it so that it outputs these values only for weights between 5 and 10?

Show me the solution

SQL

-- All animals
SELECT SUM(weight), AVG(weight), MIN(weight), MAX(weight)
FROM surveys;

-- Only weights between 5 and 10
SELECT SUM(weight), AVG(weight), MIN(weight), MAX(weight)
FROM surveys
WHERE (weight > 5) AND (weight < 10);

Now, let’s see how many individuals were counted in each species. We do this using a GROUP BY clause

SQL

SELECT species_id, COUNT(*)
FROM surveys
GROUP BY species_id;

GROUP BY tells SQL what field or fields we want to use to aggregate the data. If we want to group by multiple fields, we give GROUP BY a comma separated list.

Challenge

Write queries that return:

How many individuals were counted in each year in total
How many were counted each year, for each different species
The average weights of each species in each year

Can you get the answer to both 2 and 3 in a single query?

Solution of 1

SQL

SELECT year, COUNT(*)
FROM surveys
GROUP BY year;

Solution of 2 and 3

SQL

SELECT year, species_id, COUNT(*), AVG(weight)
FROM surveys
GROUP BY year, species_id;

Ordering Aggregated Results

We can order the results of our aggregation by a specific column, including the aggregated column. Let’s count the number of individuals of each species captured, ordered by the count:

SQL

SELECT species_id, COUNT(*)
FROM surveys
GROUP BY species_id
ORDER BY COUNT(species_id);

Aliases

As queries get more complex, the expressions we use can get long and unwieldy. To help make things clearer in the query and in its output, we can use aliases to assign new names to things in the query.

We can use aliases in column names using AS:

SQL

SELECT MAX(year) AS last_surveyed_year
FROM surveys;

The AS isn’t technically required, so you could do

SQL

SELECT MAX(year) last_surveyed_year
FROM surveys;

but using AS is much clearer so it is good style to include it.

We can not only alias column names, but also table names in the same way:

SQL

SELECT *
FROM surveys AS surv;

And again, the AS keyword is not required, so this works, too:

SQL

SELECT *
FROM surveys surv;

Aliasing table names can be helpful when working with queries that involve multiple tables; you will learn more about this later.

The `HAVING` keyword

In the previous episode, we have seen the keyword WHERE, allowing to filter the results according to some criteria. SQL offers a mechanism to filter the results based on aggregate functions, through the HAVING keyword.

For example, we can request to only return information about species with a count higher than 10:

SQL

SELECT species_id, COUNT(species_id)
FROM surveys
GROUP BY species_id
HAVING COUNT(species_id) > 10;

The HAVING keyword works exactly like the WHERE keyword, but uses aggregate functions instead of database fields to filter.

You can use the AS keyword to assign an alias to a column or table, and refer to that alias in the HAVING clause. For example, in the above query, we can call the COUNT(species_id) by another name, like occurrences. This can be written this way:

SQL

SELECT species_id, COUNT(species_id) AS occurrences
FROM surveys
GROUP BY species_id
HAVING occurrences > 10;

Note that in both queries, HAVING comes after GROUP BY. One way to think about this is: the data are retrieved (SELECT), which can be filtered (WHERE), then joined in groups (GROUP BY); finally, we can filter again based on some of these groups (HAVING).

Challenge

Write a query that returns, from the species table, the number of species in each taxa, only for the taxa with more than 10 species.

Show me the solution

SQL

SELECT taxa, COUNT(*) AS n
FROM species
GROUP BY taxa
HAVING n > 10;

Saving Queries for Future Use

It is not uncommon to repeat the same operation more than once, for example for monitoring or reporting purposes. SQL comes with a very powerful mechanism to do this by creating views. Views are a form of query that is saved in the database, and can be used to look at, filter, and even update information. One way to think of views is as a table, that can read, aggregate, and filter information from several places before showing it to you.

Creating a view from a query requires us to add CREATE VIEW viewname AS before the query itself. For example, imagine that our project only covers the data gathered during the summer (May - September) of 2000. That query would look like:

SQL

SELECT *
FROM surveys
WHERE year = 2000 AND (month > 4 AND month < 10);

But we don’t want to have to type that every time we want to ask a question about that particular subset of data. Hence, we can benefit from a view:

SQL

CREATE VIEW summer_2000 AS
SELECT *
FROM surveys
WHERE year = 2000 AND (month > 4 AND month < 10);

Using a view we will be able to access these results with a much shorter notation:

SQL

SELECT *
FROM summer_2000
WHERE species_id = 'PE';

What About NULL?

From the last example, there should only be five records. If you look at the weight column, it’s easy to see what the average weight would be. If we use SQL to find the average weight, SQL behaves like we would hope, ignoring the NULL values:

SQL

SELECT AVG(weight)
FROM summer_2000
WHERE species_id = 'PE';

But if we try to be extra clever, and find the average ourselves, we might get tripped up:

SQL

SELECT SUM(weight), COUNT(*), SUM(weight)/COUNT(*)
FROM summer_2000
WHERE species_id = 'PE';

Here the COUNT function includes all five records (even those with NULL values), but the SUM only includes the three records with data in the weight field, giving us an incorrect average. However, our strategy will work if we modify the COUNT function slightly:

SQL

SELECT SUM(weight), COUNT(weight), SUM(weight)/COUNT(weight)
FROM summer_2000
WHERE species_id = 'PE';

When we count the weight field specifically, SQL ignores the records with data missing in that field. So here is one example where NULLs can be tricky: COUNT(*) and COUNT(field) can return different values.

Another case is when we use a “negative” query. Let’s count all the non-female animals:

SQL

SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM summer_2000
WHERE sex != 'F';

Now let’s count all the non-male animals:

SQL

SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM summer_2000
WHERE sex != 'M';

But if we compare those two numbers with the total:

SQL

SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM summer_2000;

We’ll see that they don’t add up to the total! That’s because SQL doesn’t automatically include NULL values in a negative conditional statement. So if we are querying “not x”, then SQL divides our data into three categories: ‘x’, ‘not NULL, not x’ and NULL; then, returns the ‘not NULL, not x’ group. Sometimes this may be what we want - but sometimes we may want the missing values included as well! In that case, we’d need to change our query to:

SQL

SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM summer_2000
WHERE sex != 'M' OR sex IS NULL;

Key Points

Use the GROUP BY keyword to aggregate data.
Functions like MIN, MAX, AVG, SUM, COUNT, etc. operate on aggregated data.
Aliases can help shorten long queries. To write clear and readable queries, use the AS keyword when creating aliases.
Use the HAVING keyword to filter on aggregate properties.
Use a VIEW to access the result of a query as though it was a new table.

Aggregating and Grouping Data

Overview

Questions

Objectives

COUNT and GROUP BY

SQL

SQL

SQL

Challenge

Show me the solution

SQL

SQL

Challenge

Solution of 1

SQL

Solution of 2 and 3

SQL

Ordering Aggregated Results

SQL

Aliases

SQL

SQL

SQL

SQL

The HAVING keyword

SQL

SQL

Challenge

Show me the solution

SQL

Saving Queries for Future Use

SQL

SQL

SQL

What About NULL?

SQL

SQL

SQL

SQL

SQL

SQL

SQL

Key Points

The `HAVING` keyword